Methodology

Written to read like a short research paper. If a claim on this site is not reproducible from this page, that's a bug — please tell us.

1. Data

2. Model

3. Validation (what the headline numbers mean)

Evaluation windowOut-of-sample holdout, finalized 2026-08-04
Signals evaluated469,000
Discrimination (AUROC)0.642 — the model ranks candidates better than random
Precision at 5% coverage58.4% — of the top 5% of signals, 58.4% reached the target
Net return per signal+2.6% after estimated costs (commission + slippage)
Target+3% move within 2 trading days

These are backtested numbers. They describe what the model did on past data under stated assumptions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

4. Costs assumed

5. Known limits

6. Calibration

A monthly calibration report is published: "when the model said 60%, it happened X% of the time." If calibration breaks, you will see it before we do.